Archive for the ‘Archive’ Category

“For Zion’s sake I will not keep silent, and for Jerusalem’s sake I will not rest,
until her vindication shines out like the dawn, and her salvation like a burning torch.”
– Isaiah 62:1

Beloved in the Lord,

We were in Leavenworth with Chris’s family, marking Naomi’s birthday on New Year’s Eve and the dawning of the New Year with a parcel of visiting cousins we were meeting for the very first time.  Soon after arriving at their home along Icicle Creek, I was called to help my brother in law Doug remove the Tree that had stood at the center of Christmas celebrations the week before.  He was determined that there would be no lingering Tree this year; no waiting until February before disposing of it.  This year a new tradition would be inaugurated: the burning of the Christmas Tree as one year ended and another began.  It was the kind of tradition I could definitely get behind!  We carried the Tree out away from the house and planted it in the adjacent field in the two+ feet of snow that covered the ground. There it stood, upright and firm.

The plan was simple.  When fireworks were set off later that night the biggest one would be placed beneath the outstretched branches of the Tree, thus igniting its needles and creating an amazing pyrotechnic display.   As a guy who can sit around for hours watching fires, let me say that I was all over this idea.  With the Tree now in place, Doug used the snow blower to clear a space a safe distance away where we would bring the portable fire pit and chairs, while Kai and I went to work gathering wood for the bonfire.

All the elements were present to make it a truly memorable night: the snow-covered field…calm weather…a crackling fire.  As night descended, the adults gathered around the bonfire while the younger ones went searching for icicles to add to their collections.  Finally, the moment arrived.  After some preliminary rocket displays, nephew Aiden placed the Big Bertha of fireworks at the base of the Tree, tilting it so the trajectory of its flares would stream right through the branches.  Then, lighting the fuse he stood back.  All eyes were glued to the Tree as the fireworks began to fly!

You remember how susceptible Christmas trees are to burning, right?  It’s one of those axioms of modern domestic life—“Never attempt to burn a Christmas tree in your fireplace at home; there could be dire consequences.” (I know a man who actually tried this once…an L.A. firefighter no less!  You should have seen the look on his face when his neighbors, seeing the billows of smoke erupting from his chimney, called 911 and the clarion call of fire engine sirens came hurtling down the block!  But that’s another story…) Well, it turns out this Tree was not.  Not one branch or even needle of the tree actually burned.  Some were scorched, yes, but that was about it.  I guess it wasn’t dry enough yet.  The kids went into the house while those of us who remained turned our attention to the crackling fire in the pit once more.  It seemed that this was one tradition that would have to be tweaked a bit in order to match the vision of blazing glory our minds had so readily imagined.

As we turn the page each January, it is our nature to hope that the failures, flare-outs, and ill-conceived ideas of the year past will not make it with us into the New Year.  Oh! that it would be so!  We fervently long for a new order, within us and between us, where fear, violence, and dread no longer hold sway.  As people whose destiny is shaped by hope, we are learning to put our trust not in our own plans but in God’s purposes.

Isaiah captured that purpose when he spoke of God’s salvation as a “burning torch” that would light the way for God’s people.  A torch of such magnitude that it would dispel the bleak darkness of exile and usher in a new way of being and living that would bring the community into alignment with what our Creator has intended from the beginning. That light has come in Jesus.  The feast of Epiphany with which this New Year begins invites us to embrace his light, to have our eyes—like those of the Magi—opened to see just what God is up to in this one who turns plain water into the wine of community.  As 2013 unfolds, let us strive to keep our eyes focused—even glued—on him.  For he is truly the light no darkness can overcome.

New Year’s Blessings,

Pastor Erik


Of her flesh he took flesh: He does take fresh and fresh,
Though much the mystery how, not flesh but spirit now
And makes, O marvelous!  New Nazareths in us,
Where she shall yet conceive Him, morning noon and eve:
New Bethlems, and He born there, evening, noon and morn.
– Gerard Manley Hopkins

Beloved of God,

The story of how God’s love takes on flesh in the world and in our lives can be spoken in many different voices.  It can be expressed in the language of theology and through the words of philosophical inquiry.  It can be told through the lens of history, with specificity and detail.  But I find the story to be most powerful when it is most intimate. This Advent, as we begin year three of the common lectionary cycle—the year of LUKE—we get a full dose of Luke’s masterful telling of God coming into the flesh and acquiring an address on earth.

The story of Jesus’ origins and birth, which unfold bit-by-bit and song-by-song in Luke’s gospel, offers us an insider’s perspective.  We become privileged eavesdroppers and witnesses to scenes which are highly personal and even private.  Luke does not leave us standing outside of the locations or the minds of the story’s chief characters as detached observers, but rather brings us inside in his intimate portrayal.  The vast literature of music and poetry that Luke’s story of Jesus has inspired speaks powerfully to our need and desire to take hold of the radical truth that God is not aloof or remote, but has come to be with us. This year, on the Fourth Sunday of Advent, December 23, (“Little Christmas” in the parlance of some) we will follow Luke’s unfolding story in all its marvelous detail.  I hope you’ll be with us as we lean toward Christmas that day, taking in the message: DO NOT FEAR.

One beautiful example of an intimate moment portrayed by Luke comes to us from the pen of Rainer Maria Rilke.

MARY’S VISITATION
At the outset she still carried it quite well
but already, from time to time, when climbing, she
became aware of the marvel of her belly, —
and then she stood, caught breath, up on the high
 
Judean hills.  It was not the land
but her abundance that spread out around her;
going on she felt: you couldn’t have more than
the largess that she now perceived.

And it urged her to lay her hand
on the other belly, which was heavier.
And the women swayed toward each other
and touched each other’s garb and hair.
 
Each, filled with her sanctified possession,
had the protection of a woman friend.
In her, the Savior still was a bud intact,
but the Baptist in the womb of her “aunt”
already leapt, seized with delight.

There is much, as always, that begs for our attention during this full season.  The to-do lists grow impossibly long; the obligation to fashion a meaningful experience that meets the expectations of ourselves and others—and all with good cheer—weighs on us.  Alongside all of this comes the Spirit’s invitation, as the curtain parts, to come inside to behold and marvel at the audacity of the One who emptied heaven to be with us.

In joyful anticipation,

Pastor Erik



We’ve all seen images of the devastation wrought by Hurricane Sandy the last week of October.  From the Caribbean to the North Atlantic Coast, millions of lives have been affected by this “super storm.”  Our ELCA is known nationwide as a leader in disaster response.  It’s one of things we, as church, do together when we participate in synodical and churchwide sponsored ministries.  Follow this LINK to the ELCA’s Disaster Response donation website.

We want you to know, brothers and sisters, about the grace of God that has been granted to the churches of Macedonia; for during a severe ordeal of affliction, their abundant joy and their extreme poverty have overflowed in a wealth of generosity on their part.
– 2 Corinthians 8:1-2

Beloved of God,

Gratitude and thanksgiving are hallmarks of this month of November.  On All Saints Sunday we lift up the lives of all the faithful people of God who have gone before us, who have sown seeds of faith in our lives, lighting the way toward a future in which hope reigns.  Hope reigns for us and all creation because God reigns, and where God reigns there is always hope—hope both for this life and for the next, thanks to Christ’s triumph over sin and death.  Six Peace and former St. James members will be remembered on November 4th: Lyla, Elmer, K, Gena, Elma, & Grace.  Each of their stories have interacted in different ways with our own and are now enfolded into God’s story like strands of thread in a tapestry God has been creating from the beginning of time.

Celebrating the lives of those who have gone before naturally raises questions for us about the legacy of faith we leave to those who come after us. During the coming months, you’ll be hearing about one such legacy that comes to us through St. Paul’s interaction with the church in Macedonia.  Acts 16 records that as Paul and his companions went about their work of planting churches, one night Paul had a vision: there stood a man from Macedonia pleading with him and saying, “Come over to Macedonia and help us.” As soon as Paul had the vision the group set out to “cross over to Macedonia, being convinced that God had called us to proclaim the good news to them.” (Acts 16:9-10) Later, in his second letter to the Christians of Corinth, Paul writes about what he experienced with the Macedonia people.

We want you to know, brothers and sisters, about the grace of God that has been granted to the churches of Macedonia; for during a severe ordeal of affliction, their abundant joy and their extreme poverty have overflowed in a wealth of generosity on their part.”

The church communities in Macedonia, Paul goes on to say, “voluntarily gave according to their means, even beyond their means, begging us earnestly for the privilege of sharing in this ministry to the saints” in Jerusalem who were suffering from a famine. (2 Cor. 8:3-4)  How did the people of Macedonia become motivated to give to their sisters and brothers in Jerusalem?  “They gave themselves first to the Lord,” then they also gave themselves “by the will of God, to us.” (2 Cor. 8:5)  These were acts of commitment and spiritual maturity that began with their baptism and flowing from their foundational relationship with the Christ Jesus.  When people give themselves to the Lord, the Lord makes things happen—and did it happen!  Their “overflowing joy and extreme poverty welled up in rich generosity,” writes Paul.  Practicing generosity in the face of tough times is not easy.  Not for the Macedonians.  Not for us.  But it is possible—even surprisingly so—when we follow their ancient example by first giving ourselves, our lives, fully to the Lord.

In coming months the Stewardship Team will be lifting the Macedonian Challenge before us, inviting us to reflect on what we can learn and adopt for our own practices, individually, as households, and as a congregation.[1] Stay tuned!

This month we’ll be given several opportunities for generous giving to ministry needs beyond our doors. We’ve all seen images of the devastation wrought by Hurricane Sandy this past week.  From the Caribbean to the North Atlantic Coast, millions of lives have been affected by this “super storm.”  Our ELCA is known nationwide as a leader in disaster response.  It’s one of things we, as church, do together when we participate in synodical and churchwide sponsored ministries.  You’ll find a LINK on our website homepage that provides more information about how you might respond.

In addition, our THANKSGIVING OFFERING this year will help in two directions: (1) subsidizing our Agape Fund, which serves those in desperate need of help, and (2) participating in the White Center Food Bank’s new “Team Henrietta” and “Milk Banks” programs.

This All Saints Sunday we’ll hear these words from Revelation 21:

“See, the home of God is among mortals.  God will dwell with them as their God; they will be God’s peoples, and God himself will be with them; God will wipe every tear from their eyes.  Death will be no more; mourning and crying and pain will be no more, for the first things have passed away.” (Rev. 21:3-4)

We live in the hope that this vision of renewal for the future of creation includes renewal for us even now today.  We participate in that renewal whenever we gather around the Font and Table.  It’s what we do; it’s who we are.

With you on the way,

Pastor Erik




[1]For an example of a modern day Macedonian tale, follow this LINK (http://www.lutheransnw.org/content.cfm?id=213&content_id=8) to the story of Kent Lutheran Church and the transformation they have undergone through connecting with Sudanese refugees in their community and half a world away.

Will you let me be your servant, let me be as Christ to you?
Pray that I may have the grace to let you be my servant, too.
 
We are pilgrims on a journey; we are trav’lers on the road;
we are here to help each other walk the mile and bear the load.
 
I will hold the Christ-light for you in the nighttime of your fear;
I will hold my hand out to you, speak the peace you long to hear.
 
I will weep when you are weeping; when you laugh I’ll laugh with you.
I will share your joy and sorrow till we’ve seen this journey through.
 
Will you let me be your servant, let me be as Christ to you?
Pray that I may have the grace to let you be my servant, too.
Richard Gillard © 1977 Scripture in Song
Evangelical Lutheran Worship, Hymn #659

Beloved of God,

Fall is a favorite season of mine. I love the colors, the crispness in the air, the golden light of late afternoon, the harvest moon.  And I am awed by the transformation that occurs as leaves let go of their homes in the sky and begin their new project of nourishing the soil.  In autumn the earth teaches us what it means to let go, to relinquish, to shed, to become empty and ready to be filled, a lesson we practice year after year, time and again.  As I watch the leaves turn and fall I’m reminded of a poem by Macrina Wiederkehr entitled, The Sacrament of Letting Go.[1]  Here are the opening lines:

Slowly she celebrated the sacrament of letting go.
First she surrendered her green,
then the orange, yellow, and red
finally she let go of her brown.
Shedding her last leaf…she began her vigil of trust.

We celebrate two sacraments in the Lutheran Christian tradition:  the sacraments of font and of table—Holy Baptism and Holy Communion.  But if we ever added a third, I would cast my vote for the Sacrament of Letting Go.  The earthly sign for this sacrament would be a red or golden leaf plucked up from the ground where it fell.  And the texts? There are many. We’ll be hearing two of them later this month, from Isaiah 53 and Mark 10. Isaiah 53 includes the fourth and final Servant Song from Isaiah’s corpus.  You’ll recognize the verses as coming from the section of Isaiah we hear particularly in Holy Week as we contemplate the passion of Jesus:

Surely he has borne our infirmities and carried our diseases;
Yet we accounted him stricken, struck down by God, and afflicted.
But he was wounded for our transgressions, crushed for our iniquities;
Upon him was the punishment that made us whole, and by his bruises we are healed.

This Suffering Servant of whom Isaiah speaks knew the Sacrament of Letting Go.  The first Christians came to recognize in these verses the one they had come to call the Christ; the one of whom St. Paul spoke when he wrote: “Though he was in the form of God he did not regard equality with God as something to be exploited, but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave…and being found in human form, he humbled himself, becoming obedient to the point of death.” (Phil. 2) 

In the 10th chapter of Mark, after all the time they’ve spent with Jesus, all the teaching they’ve taken in, after all the miracles they’ve witnessed and experienced, we find James and John asking Jesus for special favors.  “Teacher,” they say as they sidle up to him, “we have something we want you to do for us. We’d like the places of highest honor beside you in glory—to sit on your right and on your left.”  While the gospels don’t contain stage directions, I readily imagine Jesus, after hearing their request, bowing his head, shaking it slowing, and sighing.  After all this time, they still didn’t get it!  So he tells all of them once more: 

“Whoever wants to be great must become a servant. Whoever wants to be first must be slave of all. 
For the Son of Man did not come to be served but to serve, and to give this life a ransom for many.”

Jesus asks them (us!) to learn the sacrament of letting go.  “You know how the world operates,” he tells them.  “But that’s not how we’re going to operate.”  Jesus takes the power-grabbing, top-down approach to authority and turns it on its head.  After 2000 years, the church still struggles mightily to embody the way of being that Jesus made so clear.

The hymn of Richard Gillard quoted above celebrates this call to servanthood which belongs to each one of us by virtue of our baptism.  The God who emptied himself to become one with us invites us to loosen our grip on our own agendas and yearning for power and to embrace the yoke of service each and every day of our lives. Like baptism, this letting go is a life-long sacrament.  We’re never done with it.  We are called to practice this sacrament as we send our children off into the world.  We are called to practice this sacrament as we begin a new job, or as we retire, or as we leave a home we’ve known for years and move to some place new.  We are called to practice this sacrament when, in various circumstances, for differing reasons, significant relationships in our lives can no longer be sustained.  We are called to practice this sacrament when death approaches, separating us from those we love.  No, we are never done with it, never done with letting go.  But neither are we alone.  For every step along the way, with every leaf that falls, every trembling fear, every ounce of pain and suffering, every gesture of relinquishment, we are companioned by the One who claims us in baptism, and whose promises are so secure death itself cannot put them asunder.

This month, as servants of the Servant, we’ll hit the pavement on the annual CROP Walk and write letters to congress advocating a Circle of Protection around the vulnerable poor.  We’ll hear from our youth how trips to the Yakima Reservation and other places have transformed their understanding of what it means to be a servant.  We’ll hear also how a congregation at the end of its life cycle dared to dream that by dying well it could become the seedbed for a transformed model of ministry—Luther’s Table.  (NOTE: Pastor/Developer Gretchen Mertes will be guest preacher here Oct. 21)

In autumn the trees teach us what it means to let go and become empty so we are ready to be filled.  And in doing so, perhaps they also teach us how we might embody servanthood in such a way that Jesus will smile instead of sigh.

With you on the way,

Pastor Erik

 [1] Macrina Wiederkehr, Seasons of Your Heart.  (New York: HarperCollins, 1991).

Referendum 74: A Pastoral Letter from Pastor Erik P. Kindem


September 23, 2012

Sisters and Brothers of Peace,

On September 18, 2012, a resolution to publicly endorse Washington State Referendum 74 was presented at the Church Council meeting.  The resolution came from members of the Peace Inclusivity Task Force and was presented by Leanne Damborg and Lisa Boeckh.  As my contribution to our ensuing discussion, I presented a Pastoral Letter in favor of the resolution.  The essential content of my Pastoral Letter is detailed below and I invite you to read it and learn why I advocated for this position.

In June of 2008, after an extensive conversation over a period of years, our congregation chose to publicly state its commitment to welcome Lesbian-Gay-Bisexual-Transgender (LGBT) people into our community and mission.  At a special congregational meeting we voted overwhelmingly (83% yes, 15% no, with one abstention) to become a Reconciling in Christ (RIC) congregation and to embrace the following statement:

Christ calls us to reconciliation and wholeness in a world that can be filled with alienation and brokenness.  In faithfulness to the Gospel and to our Lutheran heritage, we answer Christ’s call to be agents of healing and safety, particularly for people who have been marginalized by our society. As a Christian community, we invite all people to join us as we work to better understand the meaning of grace for our lives.  We welcome people of all sexual orientations and gender identities into the life and mission of our congregation.

Our commitment to this position, once again, is public: it is published in our worship bulletin each week, it is communicated on our exterior sign, and it is on our website.  In making this public statement we are saying that as a matter of faithfulness to the gospel, we consider ourselves agents of healing and safety, especially to the marginalized.  Among those whom we consider marginalized we include gay and lesbian persons.

To be an agent is to be an advocate.  When we write letters to elected leaders on hunger related issues next month in the Offering of Letters campaign, we will be advocating for a specific outcome.  We are saying, in effect, that not all outcomes are equal.  Some outcomes are just and fair, and conform to the vision of how God would have us treat our neighbor, and some are not.

How is it that we dare to make such a statement? We take our cue from our under­standing of the gospel and the life and teaching of our Lord, who calls us to care for the last and the least among us; who commanded: Go and do likewise.  Loving our neighbor is not an op­tional activity we can choose to engage in our not to engage in.  It is in fact what the life of faith is about.  Being public about what our faith means in particular circumstances is essential.  The authority to go public originates not in any church committee or group of leaders, but comes from the gospel itself.

It is my opinion that if such authority applies to the letters we write as advocates for the mar­ginalized regarding, for example, the supplemental nutrition legislation being considered in Con­gress, then it also applies to other issues on which we have achieved substantial agreement.   Following this reasoning, a public position of support on Referendum 74 can be un­derstood as an extension of the commitment we made when we became a Reconciling in Christ congregation. Had we chosen not to endorse Referendum 74, then we would need to have serious conversation about what being a Reconciling in Christ congregation means in real terms.

At the congregational forum on Referendum 74 that was held September 9th, as we talked about the historical evolution of marriage, the different things it has meant culturally, and how it has changed through the years, it was pointed out that some states in the U.S., until recently, had laws on their books prohibiting people of different races from marry­ing.  That set my mind to thinking.  Say, for the sake of example, that Washington State had such a law on the books prohibit­ing people of different races from marrying, and that there was a Referendum on the ballot to remove that restriction.  Would we be moved to take a public stance on such a Referendum as a church? What would our stance be?  Some might argue (and undoubtedly have argued, in the history of such legislation) that “the Bible does not condone interracial marriage.” Others might suggest that a group of folks in the congregation opposed to interracial marriage might feel ostracized if the congregation took a public position in favor of it.  Still others might suggest that if the congregation wasn’t unani­mous in its outlook, then it should not make any public statement.  In the light of what we now understand about the gospel: “In Christ there is no longer Jew or Greek, slave or free, male nor female, for all of you are one in Christ Jesus,” (Galatians 3:28), I would argue that the endorsement of a referendum freeing citizens from a racist cultural practice would be the right course for our community of faith to take.   I believe that this example provides a window into understanding what is at stake in Referendum 74.

Some have expressed reservations about taking a public stance on any given issue, suggest­ing that when we “mix religion and politics,” we head down a slippery slope.  I believe that, while we must always be thoughtful and diligent when we enter public conversations, our faith is meant to be public, and we must therefore take the risk of defining our faith stance in the public arena, choosing carefully the specific issues about which we feel compelled to speak. The teaching of our larger church (ELCA), including our Social Statements is helpful in this regard.  Integral to my position is the statement approved by the 2009 ELCA Churchwide Assembly: Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust. If you haven’t yet read the statement, I invite you to do so.

Some members of Peace have expressed concern about what advocating a particular position may do to the fabric of our community.  While I applaud the sensitivity to others that such concern manifests, I also know that we are unlikely to find 100% agreement within our congregation on any given issue, whether controversial or not.  Our goal should not be achieving unanimity, but rather de­vising a conversational process that intentionally invites and allows space for anyone who desires to offer his or her perspective.  Since we are a Christian community, this dialog takes place within a framework of faith.

Taking a public stance on an issue may very well lead to tension in the congregation.  But our goal should not be to cultivate a community life that is devoid of tension. Let’s remember –Jesus created all kinds of tension!  He constantly got into trouble because his teaching and his acting did not conform to what the religious and civil leaders considered proper teaching or behavior.  Ultimately, he took the road of the cross and was willing to lay down his life for the vision of God’s reign he embodied.  If we, as church, are afraid of stepping into controversy, then we are not modeling ourselves after Christ.  Not that we seek out trouble.  We never pursue controversy for controversy’s sake.  But when we take principled stands on issues, informed by our understanding of the gospel and the best teaching of the church, we do define ourselves; we say, as our Brother Martin did, “here we stand and we can do no other, so help us God.” Simultaneously, we continue to do all we can to reach out to one another and stay connected “as sisters and brothers for whom Christ also has died.”

Christians can and do have legiti­mate disagreements and can come to differing conclusions about how the Gospel compels us to act in any given situation.   Minority opinions and interpretations should be listened to with care, and the people who share them should always be treated honorably and respectfully.  But we should not allow the lack of unanimity to render the majority voice silent.        When it comes to the issue of Referendum 74, to not take action is, in fact, to act.  We have al­ready made a public declaration of our commitment to LGBT people.  If we stand by now, silently, while other communities of faith speak publicly against the referendum, then our prior commitment is called into question.

There is another crucial reason why it is important for our congregation to publicly support Referendum 74: the lack of a legal, uniform recognition of same-gendered relationships has resulted in situations of terrible injustice at times when people are most vulnerable—such as during health crises, sudden accidents, or death.  By publicly supporting Referendum 74, we demonstrate our care for and support of all current—and future—members, constituents, and families of Peace who are LGBT, including the children of our congregation who may not yet realize their status.  We convey the message that we support them as equals in Christ, that they will be offered the same welcome at Font and Table and the same level of pastoral care to which every other member of our congregation is entitled, and that we support the same civil liberties and civic responsibilities that are birthrights for all God’s children.

You need to know that the evolution of my own thinking on the issue of same gender marriage is long and compli­cated and has been influenced by events in my own personal life as well as the ongoing Biblical and theological debates.  I haven’t always been in the place I find myself today.  In fact, there are times in the not so distant past when I might have been aligned with those who oppose Referendum 74.  This only enhances my sensitivity to those who find themselves at odds with marriage equality.  But I am now of the opinion that the civil right to marry and to receive all the rights and benefits—as well as the duties and responsibilities—that come with the institution, should be available to all people.

On September 18th I signed a public letter of endorsement for Referendum 74, and so you may see my name published along with other faith leaders who have made that declaration.

My love for you, dear people of Peace, does not wax or wane depending on whether we are of one mind on this or any other issue.  It is rooted in something much deeper.  We belong to one another because of what Christ has done for us.  His gracious encounter with us at Font and Table equips and enables us to be his body in the world.  God’s mission is much bigger than any one issue.  And yet it is also related to all issues where basic human rights, dignities and freedoms are at stake.  I look for­ward to our continuing conversation and to fostering a spirit of respectful dialog and purposeful action within our parish.

Your servant in Christ,

Pastor Erik P. Kindem



September 23, 2012

Sisters and Brothers,

At our Church Council meeting on September 18, last Tuesday, the Church Council considered a resolution to endorse Referendum 74, the measure on November’s ballot that would legalize marriage for same sex couples. After a lengthy and thoughtful discussion, the council majority voted to support the resolution.  This action was in contrast to previous actions of the Council regarding political issues and means Peace Lutheran’s name and logo will be used publicly.  We realize this decision is cause for celebration for some in our congregation and likely a source of pain for others.  We are writing to share the reasons for this deci­sion.

First, in 2008, after extensive conversation over many years, our congregation voted overwhelmingly to become a Reconciling in Christ (RIC) congregation.  In making this decision we publicly pledged ourselves to be “agents of healing and safety” for those who have been marginalized in society; including people of all sexual orienta-tions and gender identities.  Marriage equality is an issue that deeply and profoundly affects Peace as a congregation and many of our brothers and sisters within our worship family.  We feel that the endorsement of Referendum 74 is a natural extension of our commitment to inclusivity as an RIC congregation.

Second, we endorsed Referendum 74 because we believe being Christians requires us at times to wade into the waters of tension and controversy as advocates of love and tolerance.  We are followers of Jesus Christ, who often took unpopular positions. Loving our neighbor is not an optional activity we can choose to engage in or not engage in. We endorsed Referendum 74 in support of current members, fellow worshipers and families who are Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender (LGBT) and in support of children who do not yet realize they are LGBT.  We want to communicate to them that they are supported as equals in Christ and that this congregation offers them the same welcome and supports the same civil liberties that all God’s children deserve.

Third, we endorsed Referendum 74 because there are other church bodies and leaders who have been and will be public in their opposition to the Marriage Equality Act, and without our voice the public would very likely interpret our silence as opposition. We stand with our Bishop, Chris Boerger, congre­gations of our Synod, and other communities of faith, who have gone public in their support for marriage equal­ity.

Finally, we endorsed Referendum 74 as those who have been elected by you to lead. Each council member ap­proached this question with great respect for the multiplicity of viewpoints reflected in our congregation. Our endorsement does not dictate a position to any individual member.  We encourage ongoing discussion about this important issue and have scheduled a second congregational forum for Wednesday evening, October 10, to learn more about the specifics of Referendum 74.

We seek your support and continued prayers and welcome your voice in discussions around this and other important issues of faith and conscience.

Sincerely in Christ,

Audrey Zemke, President                     Laura Bermes, Secretary

Copies of this letter, the council backed resolution, and a separate Pastoral Letter from Pastor Kindem have been mailed to all Peace households.


Jesus went away to the region of Tyre.  He entered a house and did not want anyone to know he was there…
but a woman whose little daughter had an unclean spirit…begged him to cast the demon out of her daughter.
He said to her, “Let the children be fed first, for it is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” But she answered him, “Sir, even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”
– Mark 7:24-27

Beloved of God,

Fall is in the air, and in this election year that means a good deal of attention on the air to campaigns for office at every level, as well as referendums and initiatives on the ballot. Of particular attention in our state is Referendum 74 on marriage. We’ll be hosting a congregational forum on this referendum September 9th after worship. I hope you’ll come. The gospel for that Sunday comes from Mark 7, the story of Jesus and the Syrophoenician woman. (Read quote above.)

Do you feel yourself cringing at this story the way I do? “It is not fair to take the children’s food and throw it to the dogs.” OUCH! Even 20 centuries after the fact, his words still sting. Here is a view of a Jesus we hardly ever see, and it’s a bit disconcerting to say the least. He seems prepared to dismiss this woman and send her away with nothing. It’s easy to imagine the woman leaving that house humiliated and ashamed; kicking herself for thinking that Jesus would somehow be different than the others. But if this woman is caught off guard by Jesus’ rejoinder, she doesn’t show it! Without missing a beat she delivers the best comeback in the entire New Testament:

“Lord,” she says, “you may look upon us as dogs, but even the dogs under the table eat the children’s crumbs.”

As silence envelops the room, Jesus takes in her words and is challenged to re-evaluate whom he has been called to serve, to revisit the boundaries between Jew and Gentile and to move beyond an ancient barrier.

In every other encounter recorded in the gospels, Jesus wins the debate. But here this mother bests him. His NO becomes a YES. “For saying that,” he tells her, “you may go. The demon has left your daughter.”

I once heard Presbyterian missionary Harold Kurtz speak powerfully of how the gospel serves as a catalyst of transformation in every culture it encounters. He shared an experience he’d had with the Maji, a people who sit at the bottom rung of the ladder, ethnically, culturally, and economically, in Ethiopia. The Maji are people of the land, who stay as far away from the modern world as they can and are treated like second-class citizens by their fellow Ethiopians. When they come in to market to buy something to drink, they are forbidden from drinking out of a glass like all other customers. Instead, they must bring a leaf and it is into that leaf that the market vendor pours their drink. Harold had an opportunity to go to a Maji settlement and speak with the people who had been learning the gospel story. In the midst of the meeting, one man from the community rose to speak.

LOOK AT ME, he told Harold. And pointing at himself, he asked: IS THIS A FACE OF A DOG? IS MY FACE LIKE THAT OF AN ANIMAL? IS NOT MY FACE A HUMAN FACE? ARE NOT MY EYES AND EARS AND NOSE THOSE OF A HUMAN? YET, he told Harold, WE ARE TREATED LIKE DOGS. BUT I AM LEARNING THAT THERE IS ONE WHO DOES NOT SEE ME AS A DOG, BUT AS HIS CHILD. I AM LEARNING THAT IN THE HEART OF GOD I AM WORTHY OF LOVE.

The story of the encounter between Jesus and the Syrophoenician woman could easily have been tossed out by early Christians as an unfavorable portrayal of the one they had come to know as their Lord and God. But it wasn’t. The story was remembered and passed on. There is something here that is fundamental to understanding the gospel. And if we, dear sisters and brothers, can witness Jesus himself growing in his understanding of how wide God’s mercy and justice extend, can we not imagine ourselves, too, being changed? It’s worth thinking about.

When it comes to politics, our choices on candidates and referendums will never be unanimous. But as citizens and as people called to be salt, light, and leaven, we ought to grapple with the questions nonetheless. And as we grapple, it will be our “duty and delight” to be generous with one another, practicing the arts of listening and loving as a witness to the world of the sure bond between those who follow Christ.

With you on the way,

Pastor Erik

A second Congregational Forum on Marriage Equality will be held Wednesday, October 10 beginning at 7:00pm.  This forum will focus more specifically on the language of the referendum.  At its September 18 meeting, the Peace Church Council considered a resolution to endorse Referendum 74. After a lengthy and thoughtful discussion, the council majority voted to support the resolution.

The following segment, from the ELCA Social Statement on Human Sexuality, does well to address our lack of consensus and more importantly, it reminds us of our call of profound respect for one another regardless of our differing opinions.

“As we encounter opinions and beliefs different from our own, we are called to respond with profound respect and to honor one another in community. Although at this time this church lacks consensus on this matter, it encourages all to live out their faith in the local and global community of the baptized with profound respect for the conscience-bound belief of the neighbor. This church calls for mutual respect in relationships and for guidance that seeks the good of each individual and of the community. Regarding our life together as we live with disagreement, the people in this church will continue to accompany one another in study, prayer, discernment, pastoral care, and mutual respect. (ELCA Social Statement Human Sexuality: Gift and Trust, page 21)

Your participation is valued, so please plan on attending.

Coming Soon:  Summer Block Party Hosted by Peace Lutheran.  August 18, 2012 from 1-4pm.  Please hold the date, and stay tuned for more information.  This will be an opportunity for neighbors to get to know neighbors!  39th Street SW, between Thistle and Rose, will be blocked off to encourage fun and frivolaty!  If you would like more information about helping out with this event, please contact Kevin Kay (kjk093@netzero.net) or Marcia Olson (MO3765@aol.com).